Showing posts with label Quentin Tarantino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quentin Tarantino. Show all posts

Sunday, February 10, 2013

The filmography of Quentin Tarantino

As these were not here yet and since I just watched most of them once again, I'll write my thoughts about them here briefly. Sorry about the short reviews on some of them, but really if a movie is perfect there's not much else to add to it. I'll only include the movies directed by Tarantino, even though many of his scripts directed by others are considered as his movies. Maybe one day I'll revisit those as well. You can find my review of Django Unchained here.













Reservoir Dogs (1992)

This wasn't the first Tarantino movie I ever saw, actually I didn't even know about it's existence before I saw the one below. But after that I stormed every video rental shop in the city until I found this. I remember once I finally saw it I was actually disappointed, I mean I still thought it was a good movie, but as I was expecting another Pulp Fiction, I was let down a bit. That of course has changed since then and nowadays I think this is a brilliant masterpiece. Not only is this the best "heist" movie ever made but it's also one of the best crime movies ever made. Can't really say anything about it that hasn't been said a million times, so I'll just say it's a brilliant movie and I'd rank it as Tarantino's third best film.
98%













Pulp Fiction (1994)

I still remember when I first saw this at the theaters, something I guess I'll remember for the rest of my life. I saw it at this crappy small basement theater because I was 17 at the time and the movie had an age limit of 18, but they were cool enough in that theater to not care so much. So me and my date who was a year younger got in without any problems, even though they generally were quite strict about those age limits even back then. Now that I think of it and starting to feel all nostalgic I shouldn't call the theater crappy, I actually wish there still was theaters like that today. They had character and their own feel to them, unlike these multiplexes today. Anyway the reason why I remember it so clearly is because I was totally blown away by the movie. It was something I had never seen before and didn't even think that there could be movies like this. This was one of those movies that changed me in a way. For better or worse that I don't know, but ever since I saw it I've sought out more of these 70's exploitation movies. Seeing this movie today I found some scenes not working as well as back then, like that foot massage discussion seemed to be surprisingly dragging and uninteresting. Then again I still think the second half of this movie is probably the best comedy ever made, so it balances it out more than well. Pretty much a perfect movie, Tarantino's best and one of my all time favourites.
100%













Four Rooms (1995)

For this one I'll give a proper review as this seems to be the one most people haven't seen from Tarantino's filmography. Then again this is only one fourth of a Tarantino movie, but still I think it belongs to this list as there's a clear segment and story of the movie which he wrote and directed. The problem with these kinds of movies is the difference between the makers, which usually makes the movie rather uneven. And that certainly was the problem with this one as well. There was an attempt to glue the stories together with Ted the Bellhop (Tim Roth), but unfortunately that was one of the weakest parts of this movie. Tim Roth has never done a worse performance, so much over acting and his character is all over the place all the time. Might be partly the fault of the four different directors, but still it's a weak effort. Anyway this movie has a very bad start as the first story by Allison Anders is just plain crap and even though it's only 15 minutes or so it's still way too long to give any hope for the rest of the movie. The second story by Alexandre Rockwell worked a bit better, though as the bar was set so low by the first one it wasn't much of an effort. Again bad acting and a useless story, though not as painful to watch as the first one. The third story by Robert Rodriguez is where the movie finally gets going and there's some actually funny moments. Antonio Banderas was also very strong, pulling out the best performance of the whole movie. This third story was the strongest one in the movie, apart from the ending of the fourth. Then the fourth story by Quentin Tarantino, it's actually quite a weak story as the basic idea of it is copied from Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode. Then again that's not the real problem as the idea is what sets up the absolutely drop dead hilarious ending of the movie, it's just the 20 or so minutes leading to it. The dialogue, even though it's nicely flowing as you'd expect from Tarantino, is just plain boring most of the time. Luckily the ending saves a lot, but still it felt like Tarantino didn't really put that much of an effort for this. All in all the movie is not good, with one great episode, one good episode, one bad episode and one just shit, it's way too uneven and mostly badly acted. It's actually a shame as replacing the first two episodes with better stories and better storytellers and someone focusing on directing Tim Roth this would have been a great movie.
45%













Jackie Brown (1997)

Before this movie came out I had become a fan of the 70's exploitation flicks and Pam Grier was one of my favourite actresses, with Coffy (1973) as one of my all-time favourite movies. So expectations were high as always and this one surely delivered. This movie is a bit of an oddity in Tarantino's filmography as it's his only adapted screenplay and it's told in quite a linear format. But that actually only adds to the beauty of this movie. I haven't read the book by Elmore Leonard so can't say for sure how good the adaptation is, but as a stand alone movie this is absolutely perfect. This one probably has the best mood of all of his movies and the best soundtrack to boost it. Tarantino's second best movie.
99%













Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003)












Kill Bill: Vol. 2 (2004)

I'll put these two together as that's the way they were meant to be, one four hour action extravaganza. I was really blown away by these when I first saw them, but I must say these are the ones I have most seldom revisited out of Tarantino's works. That doesn't mean they wouldn't be amazing, it's just that four hours is a long running time for a movie no matter how great it is. So my only gripe with these is the length, even though watching them again I really can't think of a single scene worth leaving out. It's very hard to place brilliant movies in any order but I'd say this is Tarantino's fifth best film.
95%













Death Proof (2007)

Tarantino's take on a slasher, though this time the usual knife is replaced with a car. The cast is great as always, even though it's a Kurt Russell show. The biggest problem of this movie is that Tarantino kind of forgets that slashers need to have people dying on them, not just chatting along. Sure when the killing starts it's brilliant, but really there's too much talking and not enough action for a grindhouse movie. Tarantino's worst, but still a good movie none the less.
75%













Inglourious Basterds (2009)

The absolutely brilliant cast carries this hilarious movie with maybe Brad Pitt's best performance ever to boost it. The thing that troubles me with this one is the continuity errors, there's way too many of them and even multiple times in one scene. I don't usually complain about things like that and I've seen plenty in Tarantino's other movies as well, but for some reason I keep spotting way too many of them in this one. But that's small details as this is Tarantino's fourth best movie.
97%

Sorry about the short reviews, but really long praising posts are rather boring to read and well I kind of expect most people have already seen these movies.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Night Visions Colt Concert 2013



4 nights of spaghetti westerns from glorious film prints (well some of them were quite worn down to be honest). That's what I call a great film festival! So I tried to cram every film to my schedule, which I would have managed otherwise as I have three of them on DVD. But unfortunately I'm getting too old for these marathons so I had to leave 2 night screenings out as I just couldn't stay awake anymore. Still, I saw some amazing movies and here's a recap of them.


 











First of all I must confess, I have never seen a Sartana movie even though they seem to have been quite popular and there is quite a many of them. Ye I know and I dare to call myself a spaghetti western fan... But well, better late than never. At the beginning I was rather troubled as this didn't look like a spaghetti western at all and the music surely didn't sound like one either. But luckily it found its tracks towards the end and there were some quite brilliant scenes. The music though didn't really strike me at any point, but the visual side was well in hand towards the end so it didn't really matter that much. Also at the beginning I was quite confused to say the least, the plot seemed to make no sense at all. Some stage coaches were robbed and everyone was killing everyone and that was about all there was. It didn't really become that much clearer towards the end, but the general idea was that everyone betrays everyone for a case of gold which everyone tries to steal in one way or another and there's some big conspiracy and this undertaker and oh fuck it, I give up. All I know is that amongst it all there's Sartana, this mystical seemingly bulletproof gun slinging “pall bearer” who at least seems to know what's going on. All the while you are just completely puzzled and mostly wondering did the body count hit one hundred already and where do all these “henchmen” come from. But it didn't really matter as the movie was still a blast. I can see why Sartana spawned so many sequels, spinoffs and even ripoffs as it's an intriguing character and this first movie was quite a great one even though it took a while to get going.
76%














Tarantino's newest turned out to be a bit uneven but still highly enjoyable ride. It had a lot more drama in it than you'd expect from a Tarantino movie, but it was actually a good thing as the movie is cracking jokes at quite a touchy subject for the Americans so it kept it from turning into a total farce. First the things that didn't work. It's the first Tarantino movie I thought could have maybe been a tad shorter, though thinking about it afterwards I can't think of anything to leave out. Would have to see it again to say for sure, but that's definitely a good thing as I really want to watch this one again. The soundtrack is mostly good, though it wasn't as brilliant as I would have expected and what made it even worse was the rap. It's not your usual western soundtrack with the likes of Jim Croce or Anthony Hamilton and Elayna Boynton in it, those worked quite well actually, but the rap, oh come on. Jamie Foxx wasn't exactly great either, but then again he's being overshadowed by Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L. Jackson in pretty much every scene in the film. Partly the fault of the script as he's not given those moments where an actor can shine, he's the unsung hero amongst these great crazy characters, but partly also because he's not really in the same league as the others. Speaking of the others, I was also a bit disappointed that Christoph Waltz has a very similar role as in Inglorious Basterds (2009) and Samuel L. Jackson is also playing in a familiar turf. They are of course brilliant at what they do, but would have hoped to see something completely new and different from them as well. Leonardo DiCaprio on the other hand is definitely out of his element and does an amazing job at it, I'd call it his best performance since What's Eating Gilbert Grape (1993). Also need to note Don Johnson who was a nice surprise as well. For a Tarantino movie those above are a surprisingly lot of things which I didn't really like, but in the end they didn't really matter that much as the rest of this movie was pure dynamite. Also as an old spaghetti western fan I was going crazy with all the references and nods towards the classics of the genre.
85%














Like I've said before Sergio Corbucci is the second best spaghetti western director right after Sergio Leone, so the chance of seeing one of his classics on the big screen was something I was surely not going to miss, even though I've seen this already couple of times before. Anyway this movie is quite an oddity amongst spaghetti westerns, mostly because of the story. It's a story about a Confederate colonel, his three sons and a woman who after the Civil War steal a ton of money from the Union in hopes of rebuilding the Confederate in the Southwest. The problem is getting the money to safety so they have a plot where they hide the money in a coffin and play a role of mourning family on their way to bury their family member. Even though they have a great disguise things of course don't go as planned as they get trouble from Union search parties, cowboys, indians, bandits and even between each other. The movie starts with a bang, but then slows down and that's pretty much my only gripe with this one, it's rather slow paced. Then again as tensions build between the group and outsiders and also within the group, the pace most of the time fits it quite well. I loved Morricone's score and the movie looks great. Joseph Cotten is brilliant in the role of the colonel not willing to let the past go. Rest of the cast is not that strong, but they are mostly fine. This one is a must see for every spaghetti western fan out there as kind of a different subject done in the spaghetti western style. And it's definitely not a bad movie even if you're not that into spaghetti westerns.
82%














My second Sartana film I've seen and after this I must say I really need to watch the others as well as this was just plain stupid but still tons of fun. Again the plot is far from clear and simple, sometimes it just doesn't make any sense at all, but again there's some gold and apparently counterfeit money and everyone is after them. And I really mean everyone, there's so many side characters and double crosses that I honestly lost count. Sartana is still bulletproof and seems to know everything before everyone else. There's some very nice spaghetti western moments, even though the plot with a smaller body count could just as well be from some detective thriller. About the body count, towards the end it just goes crazy with a huge shootout with organs pissing fire and brimstone! The music was rather good and supported the mood nicely most of the time. It's not a great movie as it's rather uneven and well it just goes a bit too stupid some times, but still it was surely entertaining and well worth the watch. And damn that Alfie is a strong little toy.
74%













Joshua the Black Rider(1976)

Joshua, played by Fred Williamson, is a civil war veteran who returns home from the war only to find his mother killed. He then goes on pursuit of the five men responsible. This is a very straight forward western with only one spice to the mix, the lead character is black. That unfortunately doesn't make this weak effort any better as it's simply put boring. The photography was quite good and there were some nice sceneries caught on film from time to time, but not exactly in the same league as the stylistic spaghetti westerns. Music was just bad and annoyingly repetitive. You can see that Tarantino took quite a few influences from this movie as well, but at least he had the skills to make them work. Some of the ways Joshua decides to kill the murderers were just stupid beyond belief. And I couldn't really understand the motives of the kidnapped woman, first you get kidnapped and raped by a bunch of murderers and then you act like they are the nicest bunch of people around. Anyway I guess it was worth the watch mostly out of curiosity, but I'm sure I won't be revisiting it either.
35%














I didn't see this one at the festival, but as I have it on DVD I decided to revisit it and put a review here as it was in the festival lineup. This is another oddity amongst the spaghetti westerns as it adds kung-fu in the gun slinging. Chin Hao is a Chinese immigrant who travels to the wild west in hopes of becoming a cowboy. He soon finds out that the west is not a hospitable place for foreigners and he of course needs to kick some cowboy ass to prove his worth. He gets a promising job as a rancher, but soon finds out that the cattle is actually Mexican slaves. Righteous man as he is he then turns against the slavers and ends up in some serious trouble. The plot is rather straight forward with not much finesse to it, but that's what you'd expect from a movie like this. Funny thing is that Klaus Kinski is billed as the star of this movie on the title credits and he actually appears in the movie not much longer than 5 minutes. Well that's exploitation for you. Chen Lee plays the main character and does a solid job even though the role is incredibly stereotypical. This movie was surprisingly bloody even compared to the others of its kind and the action was quite good, even though I'm still puzzled why everyone were such bad shooters. Then again it wouldn't make much of a kung-fu movie if the guy is shot down before he can hand out a single punch or a kick. I liked the score by Bruno Nicolai, very spaghetti western style, even though the action was quite different it still fit it very well. Even though the entertainment values were high, it still got a bit tedious at times. Well worth the watch though.
67%














Feel good western of the festival. It's a story about two naive big city snobs who come to the wild west to visit their father. As they are rather dumb they end up pissing off a group of bandits and end up in some serious trouble. Luckily they meet a mysterious stranger with incredible gun skills, called Cemetery, who decides to help them out. However the bandits hire their own mysterious gunslinger called Duke and there of course needs to be a standoff. It seems that Gianni Garko is the actor of this festival as he's the main character in this one as well, in addition to the Sartana movies. That's a good thing as he's a great character for the parts, kind of like a mix between Clint Eastwood hardness and Terence Hill charm. Comedy is the name of the game in this movie and it surely doesn't take itself too seriously. Some of the jokes are rather bad to be honest, but most of them end up digging a few laughs out of you and as the mood is so light it's a great feel good spaghetti western. I absolutely loved the theme song by Bruno Nicolai, one of the all time bests, even though it's played so often I didn't mind the repetition. The movie has it's flaws and at parts it kind of stalls from the fun swing it has, but in the end it left me with a good feeling.
75%














This is not really a spaghetti western, even though most spaghetti westerns were done in Spain. I guess you could call this a paella western, a Spanish western. This movie is grim to the bone and a highly nihilistic view of the west. It's a story about a cavalry sergeant, his daughter and a group of seven sadistic convicts who survive an ambush by a bandit gang. They are left without transportation in the middle of nowhere, while the sergeant tries to get the prisoners to their destination keeping his daughter safe from them and the bandits chasing them. If that wasn't enough trouble, he needs to figure out which one of the prisoners raped and murdered his wife. This was by far the most brutal western of the festival, both graphically and emotionally. There's not much hope in the world this movie builds and to be honest it got a bit tedious after a while. Even though it was a refreshingly different amongst the others in this festival, I can't really say I liked it that much. It's rather straight forward and lacking finesse to the point it becomes unintentionally funny. I did like the story however and in better hands it might have become an intense thriller, now it's just focusing on the exploitation aspects of it too much. I mean it's definitely not a bad movie, but can't really say it's a great one either, if you want to see a darker and more brutal western then this is a must see for you.
66%














Another one I didn't see at the festival, but as I have it on DVD I'll put it up here as well as it was in the festival lineup. This one is kind of like a Hitchcockian murder mystery in a spaghetti western disguise. I guess that's thanks to the writer Ernesto Gastaldi who's more known from writing a handful of giallo classics. Lee Van Cleef plays Sheriff Clayton who helps a man framed with murder. A powerful trio of Saxon brothers want the man dead, but the sheriff has other plans in his mind. The cast is solid and while Lee Van Cleef surely runs this show the others aren't that bad either. I especially liked the Saxon brothers. The movie includes some fairly surreal flashbacks, but other than that it's rather straight forward direction. And even though you can guess the mystery before the end there's still a twist which will make you second guess enough to keep the "surprise" even somewhat as a surprise. The title of the movie may be a bit misleading, but I guess it references the end which indeed you could see as a grand duel. I love the main theme by Luis Bacalov, but the rest of the score doesn't really come close to it. Not bad in any way but still noticeably in a different league. There's many things right in this one, but unfortunately it's quite uneven as a whole. At parts the mystery is swept aside from the entertainment values of big shootouts and then the movie wastes time to remind you of the plot again. Better balance between them and this would have been a very good movie, now it's "just" good.
68%














I really wonder who came up with this English name for the film, it kind of spoils one of the biggest mysteries of this movie. Oh well, luckily there's more than one twist at the end so it still managed to surprise me. Bill 'Niño' Tate is a mysterious young man who joins a group of train robbing bandits lead by El Chuncho. Together the group rob weapons from the soldiers and sell them to the rebel leader General Elias. Everyone in the group seems to have different motives wether it's just money, patriotism or religious beliefs and of course the motives clash on the way. The movie starts off great as it's entertaining and leaves you with tons of questions. Unfortunately it gets quite dull in the middle, but the end saves a lot as it's rather brilliant, even with the spoiling name. The story was quite good and reflecting back to the time it was made, very political as well. What I was most surprised was the soundtrack, once I saw both Luis Bacalov and Ennio Morricone in the titles I was expecting to be blown away by the score, but I must say it wasn't anything special, quite forgettable to be honest. Even though this wasn't an audio-visual beauty like what you'd expect from some of the spaghetti westerns, it was still well worth the watch and actually a great ending to a brilliant festival as it made me want to see more from the genre apart from the usual Leone and Corbucci classics.
70%


Like I said, unfortunately I had to leave the two night screenings of Viva Cangaceiro (1971) and Death Rides Along (1970) out as I'm getting way too old for these kinds of movie marathons. I'm especially sad I couldn't see Viva Cangaceiro as it's a very rare spaghetti western and I really don't know if there's ever going to be another chance of seeing it. Anyway, this festival was a blast and I hope they will do it again in the future.