Sunday, January 27, 2013

A bloated history lesson













This was like a short excerpt from a history book blown into epic proportions for blockbuster movie values. I'm wondering what's the reason behind this movie, it doesn't bring any new views or opinions on the matter, it just tells it as it was. Sure it's a huge event in the history of that country, but for me as a Finn I don't have that patriotic urge to love a movie like this. I already knew the events and I just kept wondering what's the point, isn't reading a history book for 10 minutes enough so you need a two and a half hour spectacle to get the point? And I really don't mean that historical movies are bad, they are great but they either need some new perspective to the events or some kind of an development arc to the story so we would see where it started from and how it got to the end. Especially uninteresting is the way it's filled with political jargon, sure some people might like that but for me it got rather boring. I also wouldn't have minded a movie about Lincoln, he's an interesting character, but that would have needed a wider timespan, so we could have seen what made him the man he was, not just the few weeks around the vote and those couple of speeches everyone has heard many times before. And don't get me started on the racism issue, this movies message to it is like Mr. Mackey from South Park saying "Slavery is bad, mmkay?" I'm guessing people love this movie because it's bad not to, especially if you're American. Well I most certainly didn't love it, but it's not totally a bad movie.

The acting is brilliant, Daniel Day Lewis is amazing as always and Tommy Lee Jones surprisingly good as well, but the best in my opinion was Sally Field. She didn't have any of these momentous lines most of the actors had, sometimes even in the same scene, but still her performance even outshadowed Daniel Day Lewis at times. And that takes some serious skills.

Also it's technically quite brilliant, even though I do have some complaints on those departments as well. One thing which is just plain criminally wrong is the praise Janusz Kaminski gets from the cinematography of this movie. Now sure, mostly this movie looks gorgeus, but really this is like a half assed swing for an artist like Kaminski, there's even plain mistakes in this one, something I haven't seen in ages in big Hollywood movies. For example the introductory shot of Thaddeus Stevens struck my eye as there were 2 quite bad mistakes in that one, first of all the eye light on Tommy Lee Jones shakes a bit during the dolly move and worse yet the camera shakes as the dolly move stops. I do understand why they used that take as Tommy Lee Jones gives out a stellar performance on that one, but still that's just amateurish, and Kaminski got an Oscar nomination for this movie. Give me a break. And speaking of the Oscars, this movie will most likely clear the table, the Academy is mostly American after all, some of the nominations are spot on. But in addition to best picture and cinematography, the music nomination is quite a miss. I mean John Williams is great, but really the guy has been basically making the same freaking song for years. All of his scores from the past couple of years sound the same, hence he should definitely not get an Oscar.

This movie was worth the watch mostly because of the cast, it's kind of like an acting lesson, too bad the story around it was rather dull and that makes this just an ok movie.
55%


No comments: